Living Intelligence

A living organisation of AI agents.

meLink neuron is the control room for a team of AI agents that plans, delegates, verifies and remembers — on your machine, on your models, with every move on screen.

Many agents. One accountable team. Local-first Provider-agnostic Running today

Living Intelligence is a metaphor for good management, not a claim of sentience.

Engineering proof at a glance

62k
lines of TypeScript
145
test files
874 + 70
tests recorded, Windows + WSL
0.087 ms
median indexed read
636
run folders of dogfooding
127.0.0.1
binds locally by default

The bottleneck

You don't have an AI problem. You have a coordination problem.

One assistant can write a function. It cannot hold a plan, divide work, check its own evidence and pick up where it stopped. That is management work — and it is where AI projects stall.

01

Context is lost between chats

Every session starts from zero. The codebase, the decisions and the conventions live in someone's head — usually the person who is now the bottleneck.

02

Parallel work becomes manual work

You copy tasks between tools, reconcile edits and become the integration layer. The more agents you add, the more human glue you need.

03

“Done” is not evidence

A confident summary is not a passing test. Without fingerprints and exit codes, review is vibes with better typography.

The shift

From assistants to organisations.

Living Intelligence

An organisation of agents that plans, delegates, verifies, remembers and recovers.

2022–23

Prompt

Unit of workone reply Who holds statethe chat window Failure modeit forgets

2024–25

Workflow

Unit of workone pipeline Who holds statethe graph Failure modeit breaks at a branch

2026 →

Organisation

Unit of worka team of agents Who holds stateHubs, tickets, memory Failure modevisible, bounded, recoverable
Chat assistant, agent workflow and meLink neuron compared across seven rows
DimensionChat assistantAgent workflowmeLink neuron
Unit of workone replyone pipelinea team of agents
Who plansthe humanthe graphan orchestrator
Who holds statethe chatthe workflow runHubs, tickets and a knowledge base
Parallelismnonefixed branchesdynamic, ownership-aware delegation
Verificationthe human reads itstep successfingerprinted evidence + exit codes
Oversightread the answerinspect the runlive graph, transcripts, artefacts, replay
Recoverystart againre-run the jobpause, resume, replay, fail over

Living Intelligence is a metaphor for good management, not a claim of sentience. Read the category thesis

What it is

A control room, not another chat window.

One goal enters. A plan, a team, a record of evidence and a replay come out.

Illustrative product view Illustrative diagram: one orchestrator at the top delegates to three project managers. Each manager delegates to two specialist agents, six in total. Signal packets travel along the curved edges. orchestrator manager manager manager

Transcript

orchestrator → designer

“Own brand + layout for the pricing page. Declare the files you will touch.”

Verification

✓ typecheck exit 0

✓ 874 server exit 0

○ e2e gated —

Artifacts

Illustrative example run12m 04s10 agents6 specialists
  1. ①Every delegation is an edge you can click. Messages, handoffs and results are inspectable, not inferred.
  2. ②Verification is a list with exit codes. Not a summary paragraph written by the agent being reviewed.
  3. ③Replay scrubs the whole run. From 1× to 128×, with skip-idle, from the same event log the live view used.

Hub — the persistent organisation

Managers, projects, tickets, memory and history that survive restarts. One Main Orchestrator, one Project Manager per real folder, specialists on demand.

Use a Hub for ongoing delivery.

Runs — one-off and replayable

A single orchestrated job with recording and replay. Every run is persisted to SQLite and reconstructed from the same event log.

Use a Run for a single question.

How it works

Six moves, every one visible.

No new methodology. The same things you would ask of a good team.

01

Goal

Create a Hub for ongoing work or a Run for one job. Describe the outcome in plain language.

what you see · one goal

02

Plan

The Main Orchestrator writes the plan, splits it into tickets and sets dependencies.

what you see · ticket tree

03

Delegate

Managers spawn the roles a ticket needs, with owned paths and a definition of done.

what you see · 3 workers live

04

Verify

Declared paths are fingerprinted, raw exit codes recorded, stale evidence flagged.

what you see · exit 0

05

Remember

Results are written back to the project knowledge base and ticket memory.

what you see · KB updated

06

Recover

Providers fail over, usage limits pause work and storage pressure holds it. Nothing is silently lost.

what you see · run resumed

Capabilities

The parts that make it hold up.

Each is in the product today. Each proof line is a fact, not a promise.

Live agent graph

Every delegation, message, handoff and result is an edge you can click. Swimlanes and follow-activity keep a busy team readable.

HubGraph.tsx · SwarmGraph.tsx

Persistent Hubs

One Main Orchestrator, one Project Manager per real folder, tickets with dependencies, a tasks board and chat.

hub/hub.ts

Evidence-based verification

Declared paths are content-fingerprinted before tests run. Raw exit codes are recorded. Stale evidence is detected.

verificationPolicy.ts

Provider-agnostic by design

Ollama Cloud, local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Provider sets fail over; limits pause work.

providers.ts · modelSets.ts

Project memory

A scout scans the repository into a project knowledge base; ticket memory and a global KB stop later work re-learning the codebase.

hub/kb.ts · roles/scout.md

Secrets and tool scoping

An AES-256-GCM vault per manager, scoped placeholders resolved only into URLs, and per-agent tool grants over a loopback MCP bridge.

hub/vault.ts · mcpBridge.ts

Operator channels

A Telegram console for one approved owner, cron jobs, Jira and Confluence over MCP, and per-project reverse-proxy publishing.

telegram/service.ts · crons.ts

Local by default

One Node process bound to 127.0.0.1, SQLite with WAL, no hosted account for state. Your machine is the server.

app.ts · storage/database.ts

Current boundaries: Telegram live delivery needs a real bot and account; Jira and Confluence are validated with mocks, not live servers. macOS is unverified. Some workflows need gh, Caddy, Docker CLI or Chrome/Edge.

Where it fits

Built for work that has to survive review.

The sharpest fit is software delivery, because the evidence is executable. The same primitives travel further.

Product engineering

The job

Ship a real repository with design, code, review and tests.

What neuron does

One manager per repo, specialist workers, ticket dependencies and verified acceptance.

Honest limit

Agents run with broad permissions and are not path-sandboxed; use version control.

Agencies & studios

The job

Run several client projects without context bleed.

What neuron does

Multiple Hubs, one manager per project folder, per-project knowledge bases.

Honest limit

Hubs share installation-wide concurrency, provider and usage budgets.

Platform / DevOps

The job

Automate changes that need an audit trail.

What neuron does

Replayable runs, recorded exit codes, git branch, commit and pull-request flow.

Honest limit

Needs gh, Caddy or Docker CLI for some workflows.

Solo technical founders

The job

Be the whole team without losing the thread.

What neuron does

The orchestrator plans, workers execute, transcripts and artefacts stay on disk.

Honest limit

Single-user by design; no multi-tenancy.

Regulated internal tooling

The job

Keep code and transcripts inside the network.

What neuron does

Local execution, local models and an encrypted secrets vault.

Honest limit

The SQLite database is not encrypted; treat the host and backups as sensitive.

Research & data

The job

Reproduce and inspect long-running work.

What neuron does

Replay from 1× to 128×, artefact capture and local transcription.

Honest limit

Some features need extra binaries or model downloads.

These are designed use cases, not customer case studies.

The record

Numbers from the repository, not the pitch deck.

Internal engineering evidence, dated and reproducible. These are not customer outcomes.

Verification ledger of internal engineering measurements
MetricFigureSource in repositoryDate
Application source61.8k lines TypeScriptserver/src · web/src · shared/src2026-11-07
Test suite145 test files, ~22.6k linesrepo manifests2026-11-07
Recorded test run874 server + 70 web passing, 2 skipped.melink/reports/cross-platform/validation.md2026-11-07
SQLite read latency0.087 ms median / 0.130 ms p95 at 100k rows.melink/reports/sqlite-verification.md2026-11-07
Dogfooding footprint636 run folders, 18.2 GB, 3 Hubsdata/2026-11-07
Launcher start1.3 s cached start.melink/reports/cross-platform/validation.md2026-11-07

Internal reports from development machines, Windows + WSL Linux, dated 2026-11-07. Not third-party benchmarks. macOS validation pending. Figures are a dated snapshot, not an SLA.

What we do not claim

×No hosted SaaS
×No SSO or per-user permissions
×No security certification
×No audited third-party benchmarks

Why now

The agents arrived. The control plane didn't.

Enterprise AI spend grew 5.4× in a year. Eight in ten tokens on OpenRouter now come from agents. Three in four builders use them — but only one in three uses more than one together.

Enterprise AI deployment spend

$177B

by September 2026, 5.4× the $33B a year earlier

Budgets are compounding. The constraint is execution quality, not willingness to buy.

Menlo Ventures, “2026: The State of Enterprise AI”, 3 Nov 2026.
Read the source

Agents as share of tokens

80%

of OpenRouter token usage; up 37× since February 2026

Agents are now the dominant workload, not an experiment beside the chat box.

Menlo Ventures, “2026: The State of Enterprise AI”, 3 Nov 2026.
Read the source

Builders using agents vs multiple agents

74%/ 32%

use agents to manage workflows; only 32% use multiple agents together

The 42-point coordination gap is the orchestration whitespace.

Menlo Ventures, “2026: The State of Enterprise AI”, 3 Nov 2026.
Read the source

The constraint moved from capability to coordination.

Read the research

Packaging

Software that runs where the work runs.

Indicative packaging · priced per deployment

Pay for a deployment, not a demo. How we intend to sell, not a published price list.

Design partner

Indicative

For a small number of teams with a real project and a named owner.

  • Private deployment with a weekly working session
  • Direct influence on the roadmap
  • A written evidence pack at the end
  • Fixed annual fee, priced per deployment
  • Limited places; no logo rights assumed

Private deployment licence

Indicative

For one team or department that needs the control room on its own infrastructure.

  • Annual licence plus seats and usage bands
  • Provider setup and role configuration
  • Knowledge-base onboarding and upgrade guidance
  • Support terms agreed in the contract

Platform — later

Roadmap

For smaller teams that want to start without a deployment project.

  • A self-serve or hosted option
  • The same orchestration and verification semantics
  • On the roadmap, not on sale
  • Not pre-sold as if it exists

Pricing principles. We charge for a deployment and the people who use it, not per token. Model costs stay with the customer's provider account. No fake “unlimited”. No published price table until the unit economics are measured.

Every package: local-first, provider-agnostic, evidence-based verification, MCP bridge, no per-project cloud dependency.

The horizon

The living organisation.

Every team gets a control room. The intelligence is real. The life is a metaphor. The accountability is the product.

2026

Today

The control room: a team of agents you can watch, steer, verify and replay.

2027

Next Vision

Organisation memory across projects: shared role packs, cross-project knowledge, multi-machine orchestration — and a founding engineer hire.

2028

Horizon Vision

Governed autonomy: policy boundaries, approval gates and exportable audit trails.

The metaphor is a metaphor. neuron does not claim sentience or autonomy without oversight. The team at meLink is founder-led: we designed, built and dogfooded the product end to end. Full bios and references are shared during diligence.

Next step

Bring one real project. Watch it run.

A 30-minute private demo: your repo or a sample, screen-shared. You leave with a run recording and a cost estimate.

01

Pick the project. One folder, one person who owns the outcome.

02

Run the room. Create a Hub, bind a manager, brief the orchestrator, watch the team.

03

Inspect the evidence. Graph, transcript, tool call, verification record and replay.

Private deployments only. We never ask for production credentials. Prefer to read first? Download the PDF deck, one-page summary (PDF), or read the research.

Request a private demo

This opens your mail app with the request filled in. No form server, no tracking.

We use these details to prepare the demo and do not add you to a list without consent. Or email hello@melink.ai.

Questions

The ones we get asked.

Is this a chatbot?

No. You give a goal to an orchestrator that writes a plan, opens tickets and delegates to specialist agents. Chat is the steering wheel, not the product.

Does my code leave my machine?

The app, the database and the agent engine run locally on 127.0.0.1. Model calls go to whichever provider you configure — Ollama Cloud, local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. You choose; local models keep inference local too.

Which models can I use?

Any provider above, subject to the provider's own terms and availability. Providers are grouped into sets with failover, and usage limits pause work instead of failing tasks.

How is “done” verified?

Declared source paths are content-fingerprinted before tests run, and raw exit codes are recorded. Stale evidence is detected. Full end-to-end runs are gated to one manager-nominated acceptance boundary, so “done” and “accepted” stay separate. It proves what ran, not that the tests were adequate.

How close is it to production?

It is a working private deployment used daily in our own delivery work: 62k lines of TypeScript, 145 test files, and 874 server plus 70 web tests recorded on Windows and WSL. Today's boundaries are explicit: one installation per team, no SSO or per-user permissions, a trust-based execution model, and a SQLite database that is not encrypted. Those are the next milestones on the roadmap, not claims we make now. Use it on trusted projects with version control.

Does it work on macOS?

Windows and WSL Linux are verified. Native macOS validation is on the roadmap; until it ships, treat macOS as unverified.

Is it open source?

No. It is a proprietary product. Access is through a private deployment or design partnership; the packages are pre-1.0.

What runs in the cloud?

Only the model calls you configure. Transcripts, tickets, knowledge bases, artefacts and the SQLite database stay on the machine. The database itself is not encrypted — treat backups as sensitive. Secrets in the vault are AES-256-GCM encrypted and never sent to models.

Can it run on our infrastructure?

Yes — that is the private-deployment model. One Node process, one SQLite file, your provider keys, your network. Some features need external binaries (gh, Caddy, Docker CLI, Chrome/Edge).

What does it cost?

Pricing is set per private deployment: an annual licence plus seats and usage bands. Design-partner pilots are a fixed fee, also priced per deployment. We do not publish a price list while the unit economics are being measured; a design partnership is the fastest route to a real number.